For many marketing teams, change does not happen overnight. Campaigns that once delivered steady results began to feel less predictable, especially when trying to reach Gen Z audiences. Channels that used to drive attention may have started to lose traction. Over time, a pattern became clear: Gen Z responds differently, and familiar marketing assumptions were not reliable.

Generation Z is at the centre of a shift. The group is not in the background – it already drives a growing share of consumer spending. Research shows Gen Z’s global spending power could reach around $12 trillion by 2030. Combined with millennials, the group already accounts for roughly a third of consumer spending, figures that add urgency to how brands plan and communicate.

From audience segment to decision driver

Gen Z is often discussed as a demographic category, but many organisations are starting to treat it as a decision driver. Younger employees influence which tools teams adopt, and younger customers shape which brands feel relevant. In some cases, early opinions formed by Gen Z help determine which options are even considered later in the buying process.

That influence does not always appear in a clean data trail. Final sign-off may still sit with senior leaders, but discovery and comparison happen earlier more often and across more informal channels. Deloitte’s Global Gen Z and Millennial Survey highlights how younger workers shape workplace decisions increasingly, even when they do not hold senior titles.

As a result, marketing strategies that focus only on the final decision point risk overlooking where preferences are formed.

How Gen Z is changing discovery in marketing

One of the clearest shifts tied to Gen Z is how discovery works. Linear paths, where people move from search, to site, to purchase, are less common among younger users. Recent survey data shows many Gen Z shoppers now discover brands and products on social platforms like TikTok and Instagram, often using them instead of or before traditional search engines. More than half use social media to look up brands before buying.

A product might first appear in a short clip, then resurface in a group chat, before being checked against reviews or resale prices. A brand website may come much later, if at all. This behaviour challenges long-held assumptions about visibility and intent.

For marketing teams, the situation raises practical questions. Being visible not means ranking well in one channel. It means showing up in situations where context matters and attention is brief. Reporting becomes more difficult when influence does not result in an immediate, measurable action.

Trust forms in communities

Trust is another area where Gen Z varies from older audiences. The Pew Research Centre’s Teens, Social Media, and Technology survey shows that younger users are more likely to question official claims and seek confirmation from several sources.

Comments, peer responses, and creator opinions often carry more weight than brand statements. This has changed how credibility is built; and, not flowing from brand to audience, trust forms in communities. Silence or overly-managed responses may be read as avoidance, while rigid messaging may feel disconnected.

Marketing teams are learning that participation matters more than presentation. Being present in the conversation, even without a perfect message, can carry more weight than polished campaigns that feel distant.

Measurement under pressure

As behaviour changes, measurement models are under strain. Engagement from Gen Z often unfolds over time and across platforms. Influence may build slowly, then surface in a purchase that appears disconnected from earlier touchpoints.

According to industry reports, traditional marketing attribution models often struggle to reflect complex customer journeys when interactions span many platforms and touchpoints, which is especially true for younger audiences whose discovery and purchase paths tend not to follow linear patterns.

In response, some teams are broadening how success is defined. Signals like repeat exposure, saved content, and discussion activity are used increasingly to explain momentum, even when they do not translate directly into revenue.

The change is not without tension. Finance and leadership teams often expect clear links between spend and outcome, and marketing leaders are left to bridge the gap between what the data shows and what decision-makers want to see.

Creative work speeds up

Gen Z’s expectations also affect how creative work is produced. Long approval cycles and rigid brand rules can slow response time. Coverage of Gen Z content habits in Social Media Today points to higher engagement with material that feels current and conversational, even when it is less polished.

Many teams are testing shorter production cycles and smaller experiments. Creator partnerships are part of this shift, although they come with their own risks, as tone and context cannot be fully controlled, and reactions can be unpredictable. Teams that manage this scenario well tend to set clear boundaries, then allow flexibility.

What Gen Z means for marketing leaders

For marketing leaders, Gen Z is not a single-channel challenge. It touches planning, measurement, workflow, and internal expectations. Treating it as a social media issue alone understates the scale of the shift.

The task is not to copy Gen Z behaviour nor chase new platforms, but to build systems that can respond without constant reinvention. That includes clearer feedback loops, shared definitions of success, and comfort with early signals that may not look final.

Gen Z’s influence will continue to grow, but the lesson reaches further. Audiences change faster than strategies. Teams that can listen, adjust, and explain their decisions clearly are better prepared for what comes next.

(Photo by Eliott Reyna)

Find out more about the Digital Marketing World Forum series and register here.

Tags: advertising, ai, customer experience, digital marketing, personalisation, social media, tiktok